Miaskowsky 20 April 1881 – 8 August 1950), was a Russian and Soviet composer. He is sometimes referred to as the “Father of the Soviet Symphony“. Myaskovsky was awarded the Stalin Prize five times, more than any other composer.
Early years
Myaskovsky was born in Modlin Fortress, near Warsaw, Congress Poland, Russian Empire, the son of an engineer officer in the Russian army. After the death of his mother the family was brought up by his father’s sister, Yelikonida Konstantinovna Myaskovskaya, who had been a singer at the Saint Petersburg Opera. The family moved to Saint Petersburg in his teens.
Though he learned piano and violin, he was discouraged from pursuing a musical career, and entered the military. However, a performance of Tchaikovsky‘s Pathétique Symphony conducted by Arthur Nikisch in 1896 inspired him to become a composer. In 1902 he completed his training as an engineer, like his father. As a young subaltern with a Sappers Battalion in Moscow, he took some private lessons with Reinhold Glière and when he was posted to St Petersburg he studied with Ivan Krizhanovsky as preparation for entry into the Saint Petersburg Conservatory, where he enrolled in 1906 and became a student of Anatoly Lyadov and Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov.
A late starter, Myaskovsky was the oldest student in his class but soon became firm friends with the youngest, Sergei Prokofiev, and they remained friends throughout the older man’s life. At the Conservatory, they shared a dislike of their professor Anatoly Lyadov, which, since Lyadov disliked the music of Edvard Grieg, led to Myaskovsky’s choice of a theme by Grieg for the variations with which he closed his String Quartet No. 3.
Early works
Prokofiev and Myaskovsky worked together at the conservatory on at least one work, a lost symphony, parts of which were later scavenged to provide material for the slow movement of Prokofiev’s Piano Sonata No. 4. They both later produced works using materials from this period—in Prokofiev’s case the Third and Fourth piano sonatas; in Myaskovsky’s other works, such as his Tenth String Quartet and what are now the Fifth and Sixth Piano Sonatas, all revisions of works he wrote at this time.
Early influences on Myaskovsky’s emerging personal style were Tchaikovsky, strongly echoed in the first of his surviving symphonies (in C minor, Op. 3, 1908/1921), which was his Conservatory graduation piece, and Alexander Scriabin, whose influence comes more to the fore in Myaskovsky’s First Piano Sonata in D minor, Op. 6 (1907–10), described by Glenn Gould as “perhaps one of the most remarkable pieces of its time”, and his Symphony No. 3 in A minor, Op. 15 of 1914, a turbulent and lugubrious work in two large movements.
Myaskovsky graduated in 1911 and afterwards taught in Saint Petersburg, where he also developed a supplementary career as a penetrating musical critic. (He was one of the most intelligent and supportive advocates in Russia for the music of Igor Stravinsky, though the story that Stravinsky dedicated The Rite of Spring to Myaskovsky is untrue.
Called up during World War I, he was wounded and suffered shell-shock on the Austrian front, then worked on the naval fortifications at Tallinn. During this period he produced two diametrically opposed works, his Symphony No. 4 (Op. 17, in E minor) and his Symphony No. 5 (Op. 18, in D major). The next few years saw the violent death of his father, an ex-Tsarist general who was murdered by Red Army soldiers while waiting for a train in the winter of 1918–19,[mand the death of his aunt, to whom he was closely attached, in the winter of 1919–20. His brother-in-law, the husband of his sister Valentina Yakovlevna, had committed suicide before the War because of financial troubles. Myaskovsky himself served in the Red Army from 1917 to 1921; in the latter year he was appointed to the teaching staff of the Moscow Conservatory and membership of the Composers’ Union. Thereafter he lived in Moscow, sharing an apartment with his widowed sister Valentina and her daughter. (He also had a married sister, Vera.)
Middle years
In the 1920s and 1930s Myaskovsky was the leading composer in the USSR dedicated to developing basically traditional, sonata-based forms. He wrote no operas—though in 1918 he planned one based on Dostoyevsky‘s novel The Idiot, with a libretto by Pierre Souvtchinsky; but he would eventually write a total of 27 symphonies (plus three sinfoniettas, two concertos, and works in other orchestral genres), 13 string quartets, 9 piano sonatas as well as many miniatures and vocal works. Through his devotion to these forms, and the fact that he always maintained a high standard of craftsmanship, he was sometimes referred to as ‘the musical conscience of Moscow’. His continuing commitment to musical modernism was shown by the fact that along with Alexander Mosolov, Gavriil Popov and Nikolai Roslavets, Myaskovsky was one of the leaders of the Association for Contemporary Music. While he remained in close contact with Prokofiev during the latter’s years of exile from the USSR, he never followed him there.
Myaskovsky’s reaction to the events of 1917–21 inspired his Symphony No. 6 (1921–1923, rev. 1947—this is the version that is almost always played or recorded) his only choral symphony and the longest of his 27 symphonies, sets a brief poem (in Russian though the score allows Latin alternatively—see the American Symphony Orchestra page below on the origins of the poem—the soul looking at the body it has abandoned.) The finale contains quite a few quotes—the Dies Irae theme, as well as French revolutionary tunes.[citation needed]
The years 1921–1933, the first years of his teaching at the Moscow Conservatory, were the years in which he experimented most, producing works such as the Tenth and Thirteenth symphonies, the fourth piano sonata and his first string quartet. Perhaps the best example of this experimentative phase is the Thirteenth symphony, which was the only one of his works to be premiered in the United States.
In the 1920s and 1930s Myaskovsky’s symphonies were quite frequently played in Western Europe and the USA. His works were issued by Universal Edition, one of Europe’s most prestigious publishers. In 1935, a survey made by CBS of its radio audience asking the question “Who, in your opinion, of contemporary composers will remain among the world’s great in 100 years?” placed Myaskovsky in the top ten along with Prokofiev, Rachmaninoff, Shostakovich, Richard Strauss, Stravinsky, Sibelius, Ravel, de Falla and Fritz Kreisler.
The next few years after 1933 are characterized mostly by his apparent discontinuation of his experimental trend, though with no general decrease in craftsmanship. The Violin Concerto dates from these years, the first of two or three concerti, depending on what one counts, the second being for cello, and a third if one counts the Lyric Concertino, Op. 32 as a concerto work.
Another work from the period up to 1940 is the one-movement Symphony No. 21 in F-sharp minor, Op. 51, a compact and mostly lyrical work, very different in harmonic language from the Thirteenth.
Despite his personal feelings about the Stalinist regime, Myaskovsky did his best not to engage in overt confrontation with the Soviet state. While some of his works refer to contemporary themes, they do not do so in a programmatic or propagandistic way. The Symphony No. 12 was inspired by a poem about the collectivization of farming, while No. 16 was prompted by the crash of the huge airliner Maxim Gorky and was known under the Soviets as the Aviation Symphony. This symphony, sketched immediately after the disaster and premiered in Moscow on 24 October 1936, includes a big funeral march as its slow movement, and the finale is built on Myaskovsky’s own song for the Red Air Force, ‘The Aeroplanes are Flying’. The Salutation Overture was dedicated to Stalin on his sixtieth birthday.
Final decade
The year 1941 saw Myaskovsky evacuated, along with Prokofiev and Aram Khachaturian among others, to what were then the Kabardino-Balkar regions. There he completed the Symphony-Ballade (Symphony No. 22) in B minor, inspired in part by the first few months of the war. Prokofiev’s Second String Quartet and Myaskovsky’s Symphony No. 23 and Seventh String Quartet contain themes in common—they are Kabardinian folk-tunes the composers took down during their sojourn in the region. The sonata-works (symphonies, quartets, etc.) written after this period and into the post-war years (especially starting with the Symphony No. 24, the piano sonatina, the Ninth Quartet) while Romantic in tone and style, are direct in harmony and development. He does not deny himself a teasingly neurotic scherzo, as in his last two string quartets (that in the Thirteenth Quartet, his last published work, is frantic, and almost chiaroscuro but certainly contrasted) and the general paring down of means usually allows for direct and reasonably intense expression, as with the Cello Concerto (dedicated to and premiered by Sviatoslav Knushevitsky) and Cello Sonata No. 2 (dedicated to Mstislav Rostropovich).
While not particularly experimental, there is no suggestion—as with some earlier works—that Scriabin or Arnold Schoenberg might still have been an influence. In 1947 Myaskovsky was singled out, with Shostakovich, Khachaturian and Prokofiev, as one of the principal offenders in writing music of anti-Soviet, ‘anti-proletarian’ and formalist tendencies. Myaskovsky refused to take part in the proceedings, despite a visit from Tikhon Khrennikov pointedly inviting him to deliver a speech of repentance at the next meeting of the Composers’ Union. He was only rehabilitated after his death from cancer in 1950, leaving an output of eighty-seven published opus numbers spanning some forty years and students with recollections. (There is also a recollection in the Volkov book Testimony.)
Legacy
Character and influence
Myaskovsky was long recognized as an individualist, even by the Soviet establishment. In the 1920s the critic Boris Asafyev commented that he was “not the kind of composer the Revolution would like; he reflects life not through the feelings and spirit of the masses, but through the prism of his personal feelings. He is a sincere and sensible artist, far from ‘life’s enemy’, as he has been portrayed occasionally. He speaks not only for himself, but for many others”.
Myaskovsky never married and was shy, sensitive and retiring; Pierre Souvtchinsky believed that a “brutal youth (in military school and service in the war)” left him “a fragile, secretive, introverted man, hiding some mystery within. It was as if his numerous symphonies provide a convenient if not necessary refuge in which he could hide and transpose his soul into sonorities”.
Stung by the many accusations in the Soviet press of “individualism, decadence, pessimism, formalism and complexity”, Myaskovsky wrote to Asafiev in 1940, “Can it be that the psychological world is so foreign to these people?” When somebody described Zhdanov’s decree against “formalism” to him as “historic”, he is reported to have retorted “Not historic – hysterical” Shostakovich, who visited Myaskovsky on his deathbed, described him afterwards to the musicologist Marina Sabinina as “the most noble, the most modest of men”. Mstislav Rostropovich, for whom Myaskovsky wrote his Second Cello Sonata late in life, described him as “a humorous man, a sort of real Russian intellectual, who in some ways resembled Turgenev“.
As professor of composition at Moscow Conservatory from 1921 until his death, Myaskovsky exercised an important influence on his many pupils. The young Shostakovich considered leaving Leningrad to study with him, and those who did become his students included Aram Khachaturian, Dmitri Kabalevsky, Vissarion Shebalin, Rodion Shchedrin, German Galynin, Andrei Eshpai, Alexei Fedorovich Kozlovsky, Alexander Lokshin, Boris Tchaikovsky, and Evgeny Golubev.
The degree and nature of his influence on his students is difficult to measure. What is lacking is an account of his teaching methods, what and how he taught, or more than brief accounts of his teaching; Shchedrin makes a mention in an interview he did for the American music magazine Fanfare, and a section in Testimony, if authentic, is another. It has been said that the earlier music of Khachaturian, Kabalevsky and other of his students has a Myaskovsky flavor, with this quality decreasing as the composer’s own voice emerges (since Myaskovsky’s own output is internally diverse such a statement needs further clarification) —while some composers, for instance the little-heard Evgeny Golubev, kept something of his teacher’s characteristics well into their later music. The latter’s sixth piano sonata is dedicated to Myaskovsky’s memory and the early “Symphony No. 0” of Golubev’s pupil Alfred Schnittke, released on CD in 2007, has striking reminiscences of Myaskovsky’s symphonic style and procedures.
Recordings
Myaskovsky has not been as popular on recordings as have Shostakovich and Prokofiev. Nonetheless, most of his works have been recorded, many of them more than once, including the Cello Concerto, the Violin Concerto, many of the Symphonies, and much of his chamber and solo music.
Between 1991 and 1993 the conductor Yevgeny Svetlanov realized a massive project to record Myaskovsky’s entire symphonic output and most of his other orchestral works on 16 CDs, with the Symphony Orchestra of the USSR and the State Symphony Orchestra of the Russian Federation. In the chaotic conditions prevailing at the breakup of the USSR, Svetlanov is rumoured to have had to pay the orchestral musicians himself in order to undertake the sessions. The recordings began to be issued in the West by Olympia Records in 2001, but ceased after volume 10; the remaining volumes were issued by Alto Records starting in the first half of 2008. To complicate matters, in July 2008, Warner Music France issued the entire 16-CD set, boxed, as volume 35 of their ‘Édition officielle Evgeny Svetlanov’.
In a testimony printed in French and English in the accompanying booklet, Svetlanov describes Myaskovsky as “the founder of Soviet symphonism, the creator of the Soviet school of composition, the composer whose work has become the bridge between Russian classics and Soviet music … Myaskovsky entered the history of music as a great toiler like Haydn, Mozart and Schubert. … He invented his own style, his own intonations and manner while enriching and developing the glorious tradition of Russian music”. Svetlanov also likens the current neglect of Myaskovsky’s symphonies to the neglect formerly suffered by the symphonies of Gustav Mahler and Anton Bruckner.
Advocates
One of Myaskovsky’s strongest early advocates was the conductor Konstantin Saradzhev. He conducted the premieres of Myaskovsky’s 8th, 9th and 11th symphonies and the symphonic poem Silence, Op. 9 (which was dedicated to Saradzhev). The 10th Symphony was also dedicated to Saradzhev. In 1934 Myaskovsky wrote a Preludium and Fughetta on the name Saradzhev (for orchestra, Op. 31H; he also arranged it for piano 4-hands, Op. 31J).
In the 1930s, Myaskovsky was also one of two Russian composers championed by Frederick Stock, the conductor of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra. The other was Reinhold Glière, whom he met in 1940 and commissioned to write his “Feast in Fergana”, Op. 75, a large-scale orchestral fantasia.
Stock met Myaskovsky in March 1938 at the invitation of the Composers Union. He commissioned Myaskovsky’s 21st Symphony (Symphony-Fantasy in F-sharp minor) for the Chicago Symphony’s Fiftieth Anniversary. The first performance was in Moscow on November 6, 1940 (conducted by Aleksandr Gauk); Stock conducted the Chicago premiere on December 26, 1940. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Myaskovsky
Nikolai Myaskovsky – Concerto for Violin and Orchestra. ор. 44 Perform – Оrchestra of the Mariinsky theatre, conducted by V. Gergiev, the soloist V. Repin. 1. Allegro ed appassionato 2. Adagio molto cantabile 3. Allegro molto
BBC Philarmonic conducted by Sir Edward Downes I – Andante sostenuto – Moderato malinconico con moto: 0:00 II – Presto: 10:27 III – Lento molto: 17:36 IV – Allegro con grazia: 26:35 Myaskovsky’s ninth symphony was started shortly after his return from Vienna. Composed in parallel with the tenth symphony. Both ended almost simultaneously at the end of 1927. It is dedicated to the director Nikolay Malko, who had premiered the fifth. The first movement does not use the sonata form, using a ternary structure. It starts with dissonant chords in Miaskovsky’s own style, until the theme appears in a more defined tone. A melody of melancholic type is presented below, which develops contrapuntally. A metal transition motif is heard before moving on to the next section. The central part of the movement is occupied by a quiet romantic melody. Then the initial chords reappear, before repeating the first theme. After new transitional chords, the main theme ends the movement with a resigned and sad melancholy. The second movement corresponds to a scherzo, which uses the sonata form. The first theme is alive, but not very determined. The music is colorful including the sound of the harp and the bells, in the second theme of Christmas character, in a more clear and rhythmic way. After a brief development, which culminates with a lively interpretation of the second theme, the themes are recapitulated in the opposite direction. The third movement presents its first theme of Russian folk character through the clarinet, accompanied by the string and harp. In the central part the flute presents a new undulating theme accompanied by cellos and basses. Then the main theme is played by the oboe in his recapitulation, to then go to the orchestra. The movement ends with a thoughtful coda. The last movement is written in the form of a rondo. The main theme is presented by the violas rhythmically. It also takes material from the first movements. The atmosphere becomes more sinister during development. In the central part the melancholy of the slow movement reappears, interrupted by the main theme as it corresponds to the rondo form, until arriving at the determining coda. Picture: “The Pretenders” (1852) by the French painter Gustave Moreau.